Roediger's Tips for Reviewers

Some blog followers might be interested in a discussion-list post “Roediger's Tips for Reviewers” [Hake (2011)].

The abstract reads:

************************************************
ABSTRACT: The inadequate reviewing of articles submitted for publication in the field of Physics Education Research (PER) suggests revisiting Henry Roeidiger's (2007) “Twelve Tips for Reviewers” http://bit.ly/oOR5iQ. I list six of those TIPS which are often ignored by PER reviewers.

For the few “Good Reviewers” of PER article submissions who may wish to get in step with the PER’s army of “Bad Reviewers,” I strongly recommend Mohammad Sal Moslehian's “How To Be a Bad Referee?!” http://bit.ly/ranWvb.
************************************************

To access the complete 11 kB post please click on http://bit.ly/pPrHqY.


Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Honorary Member, Curmudgeon Lodge of Deventer, The Netherlands
President, PEdants for Definitive Academic References which
Recognize theInvention of the Internet (PEDARRII)

rrhake@earthlink.net
http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake
http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi
http://HakesEdStuff.blogspot.com
http://iub.academia.edu/RichardHake


REFERENCES [URL's shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 3 August 2011.]
Hake, R.R. 2011. “Roediger's Tips for Reviewers,” online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at http://bit.ly/pPrHqY. Post of 3 Aug 2011 10:27:03-0700 to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to various discussion lists.