Showing posts with label constructivism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label constructivism. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Re: Could 'Precision Teaching' and the Wider Education Communities Learn Something From One Another?

Some blog followers might be interested in a post titled “Re: Could 'Precision Teaching' and the Wider Education Communities Learn Something From One Another? “[Hake (2010b)]. The abstract reads:


########################################

ABSTRACT: Julie Vargas, daughter of B.F. Skinner and President of the B.F. Skinner Foundation http://www.bfskinner.org/BFSkinner/Home.html , commented on my post “Could 'Precision Teaching' and the Wider Education Communities Learn Something From One Another?" [Hake (2010a)] as follows (quoted with permission; my insert at “. . . .[[insert]]. . . .”):


1. [In “Behavior Analysis for Effective Teaching ” (Vargas, 2009)] I quote [Eric Mazur]. . . . . . What I didn't know was that his work was being touted as "constructivist-oriented” "Interactive Engagement."


2. I don't see [Mazur's] work as like Direct Instruction. . . . [[in this post I give various conflicting meanings of the vague term “direct instruction"]]. . . . As described in his book he just poses practical multiple-choice questions following a mini-lecture (usually a third of the lecture hour) students first answer and then discuss among themselves and answer again as he walks around listening to their explanations. There is no choral responding.


3. I'm not sure [Mazur's method] is like Precision Teaching either. I didn't see any fluency exercises, nor student graphing.


4. But [Mazur's method] is definitely BEHAVIORAL in asking for student responding, adjusting according to how they do answer, and in the objectives being stated in clear terms that require "applying" the principles to every day life in addition to just memorizing them.


To access the complete 18 kB post, please click on http://tinyurl.com/y8mnz8n .


REFERENCES [Tiny URL's courtesy http://tinyurl.com/create.php .]


Hake. R.R. 2010a. “Could 'Precision Teaching' and the Wider Education Communities Learn Something From One Another?" online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at http://tinyurl.com/ye5rrnq . Post of 25 Mar 2010 11:47:54-0700 to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract was also sent to various discussion lists and is online at http://hakesedstuff.blogspot.com/2010/03/could-precision-teaching-and-wider.html with a provision for comments.


Hake. R.R. 2010b. “Re: Could 'Precision Teaching' and the Wider Education Communities Learn Something From One Another?" online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at http://tinyurl.com/y8mnz8n . Post of 31 Mar 2010 09:54:24 -0700 to AERA-L Net-Gold, and SClistserv. The abstract is also being sent to various discussion lists.


Vargas, J. 2009. Behavior Analysis for Effective Teaching. Routledge, publisher's information at http://tinyurl.com/yzbzurp . Amazon.com information at http://tinyurl.com/yc8hz2y. Note the searchable “Look Inside” feature. An expurgated “Google Book Preview” is online at http://tinyurl.com/yh7lpxk . Vargas discusses the following aspects of the semi-log “Standard Celeration” chart” (SCchart) of “counts” vs time (use the “>” at the top of the page to scroll through the pages): (a) Lindsley's development of “Precision Teaching” and the SCchart on pages 126 and 127; (b) “counts” as a measure of behavior at the top of page 103; (c) interpretation of the SCchart on page 132. If I understand the “Standard Celeration” chart correctly (please correct me if I'm wrong) it's essentially the behavorists' version of a kinematics semilog plot of speed (time rate of change of position) “v” vs time “t”. Hence “Celeration” from the “celeration” part of the kinematics “acceleration.”

Friday, December 18, 2009

Re: All about constructivism

Some blog followers may be interested in a recent discussion-list post of the above title [Hake (2009)]. The abstract reads:


ABSTRACT: Doug Holton, in a "Learning Sciences and Educational Technology Group (LSET)" post titled "All about constructivism," alerted readers to the fact that Alexander Riegler has placed radical constructivist Ernst von Glasersfeld's papers on the web at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/EvG/ .


These might serve as an antidote to “Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching” by Kirschner et al. (2006).


Holton references responses to Kirschner et al. (2006) by Hmelo-Silver et al. (2007), Schmidt et al. (2007), & Kuhn (2007)], but the most definitive rejoinder is “Language Ambiguities in Education Research” [Hake (2008)], mindlessly rejected by the Journal of Learning Sciences.


To access the complete 6 kB post please click on http://tinyurl.com/mb8pl2 .


REFERENCES


Hake, R.R. 2008. “Language Ambiguities in Education Research,” submitted to the Journal of Learning Sciences on 21 August; online as ref. 54 at http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake .


Hake, R.R. 2009. "Re: All about constructivism," online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at http://tinyurl.com/mb8pl2. Post of 22 Jul 2009 10:30:43-0700 to AERA-L, IFETS, LSET, Net-Gold, PBL, PhysLrnR, PsychTeacher, TIPS, & WBTOLL-L.


Kirschner, P.A. , J. Sweller, & R.E. Clark. 2006. “Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching,” Educational Psychologist 41(2): 75-86; online as a 176 kB pdf at http://tinyurl.com/3xmp2m .


Friday, November 7, 2008

Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME)

Some readers might be interested in "Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME) [Hake & Mallow (2008)].  (Please scroll down to REFERENCES, find "Hake & Mallow (2008) and click on the indicated URL.)

REFERENCES
Hake, R.R. & J.V. Mallow. 2008. "Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME): Over 700 Annotated References and 1000 URL's:
Part 1 - All References in Alphabetical Order; and
Part 2 - Some References in Subject Order;
all online as ref. 55 at  http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/

Part 2 subjects are:

a. Affirmative Action;
b. Constructivism: Educational and Social;
c. Drivers  of Educational Reform and Gender Equity: Economic Competitiveness and 
      Preservation of Life on Planet Earth;
d. Education and the Brain;
e. Gender and Spatial Visualization;
f. Harvard President Summers' Speculation on Innate Gender Differences in 
      Science and Math Ability; 
g. Hollywood Actress Danica McKellar's Book "Math Doesn't Suck";
h. Interactive Engagement;
i. International Comparisons;
j. Introductory Physics "Curriculum S" (for Synthesis);
k. Is There a Female Science? - Pro & Con;
l. Schools Shortchange Girls (or is it Boys?)
m. Sex Differences in Mathematical Ability: Fact or Artifact?;
n. Status of Women at MIT.