Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Evaluating the Effectiveness of College

Some blog followers might be interested in a recent post “Evaluating the Effectiveness of College” [Hake (2013)]. The abstract reads:

*********************************************
ABSTRACT:Matthew Von Hendy of the EvalTalk list pointed to an article “Congratulations, College Graduate. Now Tell Us: What Did You Learn?” [Selingo (2013a)] at http://linkd.in/10FdFui. Selingo, in turn, pointed to the research of Arum & Roksa (2011) as presented in their book Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses http://bit.ly/RrkWhK. For a more extensive discussion than Selingo’s on the limited learning imparted by U.S. higher education see, e.g.:

(a) “Are colleges failing?” [Hake (2005)] at http://bit.ly/erBRGN;

(b) “Should the Culture of University Science Education Be Changed” [Hake (2011)] at http://bit.ly/iegznz;

(c) “Re: Culture Change for Learning” [Hake (2012a)] at http://bit.ly/HJ2zLf; and

(d) “U.S. Colleges Put Low Priority on Student Learning” [Hake (2012b) at http://bit.ly/KU0UEy.

The above four essays reference, in addition to Arum & Roksa (2011) [in chronological order by publication date]:

(1) Academic Duty [Kennedy (1999)] at http://bit.ly/edBogg;

(2) A University for the 21st Century [Duderstadt (2000)] at http://bit.ly/cvJ1yI;

(3) Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More [Bok (2005b] at http://amzn.to/kXOKbF;

(4) Higher Education?: How Colleges Are Wasting Our Money and Failing Our Kids - and What We Can Do About It [Hacker & Dreifus (2010)] at http://amzn.to/bunggt

(5) We’re Losing Our Minds: Rethinking American Higher Education [Keeling & Hersh (2011)] at http://bit.ly/IOE8wU; and

(6) College: What It Was, Is, and Should Be [Delbanco (2012)] at http://bit.ly/LzpMny.

A precursor of the above six books critical of U.S. higher education is Jacques Barzun’s (1968, 1993) The American University: How It Runs, Where It Is Going at http://bit.ly/10umFkS.
*********************************************

To access the complete 23 kB post please click on http://yhoo.it/16cJ7HO.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: http://bit.ly/a6M5y0
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: http://bit.ly/9nGd3M
Academia: http://bit.ly/a8ixxm
Blog: http://bit.ly/9yGsXh
GooglePlus: http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE
Google Scholar: http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3
Twitter: http://bit.ly/juvd52
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm

“. . . studies indicate that problem-based discussion, group study, and other forms of active learning produce greater gains in critical thinking than lectures, yet the lecture format is still the standard in most college classes, especially in large universities."
- Derek Bok (2005), former president of Harvard University, in "Are colleges failing? Higher Ed Needs New Lesson Plans" [Bok (2005b)]

“The academic area is one of the most difficult areas to change in our society. We continue to use the same methods of instruction, particularly lectures, that have been used for hundreds of years. Little scientific research is done to test new approaches, and little systematic attention is given to the development of new methods. Universities that study many aspects of the world ignore the educational function in which they are engaging and from which a large part of their revenues are earned.”
- Richard M. Cyert, former president of Carnegie Mellon University, quoted in Tuma & Reif (1980):

“Few faculty members have any awareness of the expanding knowledge about learning from psychology and cognitive science. Almost no one in the academy has mastered or used this knowledge base. One of my colleagues observed that if doctors used science the way college teachers do, they would still be trying to heal with leeches. ”
- James Duderstadt (2000), President Emeritus and University Professor of Science and Engineering at the University of Michigan, in A University for the 21st Century [Duderstadt (2000)]

“We have not been very systematic about our quest to improve teaching, even though we value it highly and frequently do well at it. I am struck, for example, by the lack of conversation about what pedagogy means, and what makes it successful. It is our profession, yet it is mysteriously absent from our professional discourse. Here we are, engaged in an activity that is vital to ourselves, our students, and our public - yet we speak of how to do it, if at all, as though it had no data base, lacked a history, and offered no innovative challenges. ”
- Donald Kennedy, former president of Stanford University, in his "Stanford President's Address: Stanford in Its Second Century" - see also AcademicDuty [Kennedy (1999)].


REFERENCES [URL’s shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 15 May 2013.]
Bok, D. 2005a. “Are colleges failing? Higher Ed Needs New Lesson Plans,” Boston Globe, 18 December, copied into the APPENDIX of Hake (2005).

Duderstadt, J.J. 2000. A University for the 21st Century. Univ. of Michigan Press, publisher’s information at http://bit.ly/cvJ1yI. Amazon.com information at http://amzn.to/lxT8YU, note the searchable “Look Inside” feature.

Hake, R.R. 2005. “Are colleges failing?” AERA-L post of 19 Dec 2005 17:54:37-0800; online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at http://bit.ly/erBRGN. The APPENDIX contains a copy of Bok (2005).

Hake, R.R. 2013. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of College,” online on the OPEN! Net-Gold archives at http://yhoo.it/16cJ7HO. Post of 14 May 2013 16:35:04-0700 to AERA-L and Net-Gold.

Kennedy, D. 1999. Academic Duty. Harvard University Press, publisher’s information at http://bit.ly/edBogg. Amazon.com information at http://amzn.to/hbeAsp, note the “Look Inside” feature. An expurgated Google book preview is online at http://bit.ly/hmuC5R.

Tuma, D.T. & F. Reif, eds. 1980. Problem Solving and Education: Issues in Teaching and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum. Amazon.com information at http://amzn.to/jcAK2d.





Saturday, May 11, 2013

How To Write Good – ADDENDUM #2

Some blog followers might be interested in a recent post “How To Write Good – ADDENDUM #2” [Hake (2013)]. The abstract reads:

*********************************************
ABSTRACT: In response to “How to Write Good” [Hake (2013)] at http://yhoo.it/15ouwJm, Gene Glass wrote (paraphrasing): “The Elements of Style [Strunk & White (1959, 2000)] at http://bit.ly/13ZRsda might be the undergrad’s guide to good writing, but Jacques Barzun’s (1975, 2001) Simple & Direct at http://amzn.to/10wv2lq is surely the postgraduate textbook.”

That Simple & Direct is also “Thorough and Scholarly” is manifest in its CONTENTS page:
Introduction
I. DICTION, or Which Words to Use
II. LINKING, or What to Put Next
III. TONE AND TUNE, or What Impression Will It Make
IV. MEANING, or What Do I Want to Say?
V. COMPOSITION, or How Does It Hang Together
VI. REVISION, or What Have I Actually Said?
Hints Toward Improving the Quoted Sentences
Index of Words, Topics, and Authors

For information on Barzun see e.g.:
(a) the Wikipedia entry at http://bit.ly/Yxp4yw;
(b) the eulogy by Rothstein (2012) at http://nyti.ms/YIPAY1;
(c) the eulogy by Epstein (2012) at http://on.wsj.com/ZU4xoR;
(d) the interview by Gathman (2000) at http://bit.ly/17dQaje;
(e) the biography by Murray (2011) at http://amzn.to/120G3rS;
(f) Barzun's (2002) book A Stroll With William James http://amzn.to/19bReAB, whom Barzun regarded as his “guide and mentor.”
*********************************************

To access the complete 18 kB post please click on http://yhoo.it/11tJ4WK.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: http://bit.ly/a6M5y0
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: http://bit.ly/9nGd3M
Academia: http://bit.ly/a8ixxm
Blog: http://bit.ly/9yGsXh
GooglePlus: http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE
Google Scholar: http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3
Twitter: http://bit.ly/juvd52
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm

“[Jacques Barzun] wrote in a flawless and magisterial manner on a vast array of subjects: Darwin, Marx, Wagner, Berlioz, William James, French verse, English prose composition, university teaching, detective fiction, the state of intellectual life, and finally, published when he was 93, his magnum opus, From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural Life, 1500 to the Present. None of this writing seemed motivated by his desire to advance his career; all of it derived from genuine intellectual passion.”
- Epstein (2012)


REFERENCES [URL’s shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 11 May 2013.]
Epstein, J. 2012. “Jacques Barzun: An Appreciation” Wall Street Journal, 26 Oct., online to subscribers at http://on.wsj.com/ZU4xoR (non-subscribers can read the entire article by searching Google for “Jacques Barzun: An Appreciation.”

Hake, R.R. 2013. “How To Write Good – ADDENDUM #2,” online on the OPEN! Net-Gold archives at http://yhoo.it/11tJ4WK. Post of 11 May 2013 14:56:55 -0700. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists.


Wednesday, May 8, 2013

How To Write Good

Some blog followers might be interested in a recent post “How To Write Good” [Hake (2013)]. The abstract reads:

*********************************************
ABSTRACT: Physoc’s Art Hobson, in a post “Once more time: Writing tips” alerted readers to (a) the abstract and the slides http://bit.ly/16T0UmN he had shown for a 2009 APS talk “Writing about, and teaching, physics for non-scientists”; and (b) two recommendations –
(1) The Craft of Scientific Writing [Alley (1996)] at http://amzn.to/YBnwWu, and
(2) The Elements of Style [Strunk & White (2000)] at http://amzn.to/109Cb9E.

To Hobson's recommendations I would add:
(3) the AIP Style Manual [AIP (1997)] at http://bit.ly/d8hJgp;

(4) “Intellectual Journey: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom - Conversations with John Kenneth Galbraith - The Art of Good Writing” [Kreisler (1986)] at http://bit.ly/ZMesNj;

(5) The Technique of Clear Writing [Gunning (1968)] at http://amzn.to/11QtG1t.

(6) “Draft No. 4: Replacing the words in boxes” [McPhee (2013)] at http://nyr.kr/12cz2Vu.

Q. So “HOW’m I DOin’ ” after having been exposed to the above 6 guides to writing good?

A. NOT BAD! The first 489 words of this post have a Gunning Fog Index of 8.8, cf. 11.9 for the first 530 words of Hemingway's masterpiece The Sun Also Rises !
; - )
*********************************************

To access the complete 14 kB post please click on http://yhoo.it/15ouwJm.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: http://bit.ly/a6M5y0
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: http://bit.ly/9nGd3M
Academia: http://bit.ly/a8ixxm
Blog: http://bit.ly/9yGsXh
GooglePlus: http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE
Google Scholar: http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3
Twitter: http://bit.ly/juvd52
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/XI7EK

“We are all apprentices of a craft where no one ever becomes a master.”
- Ernest Hemingway (1961)

REFERENCES [URL’s shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 08 May 2013.]
Hake, R.R. 2013. “How To Write Good,” online on the OPEN! Net-Gold archives at http://yhoo.it/15ouwJm. Post of 7 May 2013 20:00:15-0700. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists.

Hemingway, E. 1961. New York Journal-American, 11 July.

Monday, May 6, 2013

Effective Teachers Need Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Some blog followers might be interested in a recent post “Effective Teachers Need Pedagogical Content Knowledge” [Hake (2013)]. The abstract reads:

*********************************************
ABSTRACT: Phil Sadler alerted the PhysLrnR list to “The Influence of Teachers' Knowledge on Student Learning in Middle School Physical Science Classrooms” [Sadler et al. (2013)] online to subscribers at http://bit.ly/11bvLtS. That article suggests that “a teacher's ability to identify students' most common wrong answer on multiple-choice items, A FORM OF PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE, is an additional measure of science teacher competence.” [My CAPS.]

That pedagogical content knowledge is important for effective teaching was emphasized in Lesson #7 of “Lessons from the Physics Education Reform Effort” [Hake (2002)] at http://bit.ly/aL87VT: “Teachers who possess both content knowledge and ‘pedagogical content knowledge’ are more apt to deliver effective instruction.”
*********************************************

To access the complete 12 kB post please click on http://yhoo.it/13Zh89O.


Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: http://bit.ly/a6M5y0
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: http://bit.ly/9nGd3M
Academia: http://bit.ly/a8ixxm
Blog: http://bit.ly/9yGsXh
GooglePlus: http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE
Google Scholar http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3
Twitter: http://bit.ly/juvd52
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm

“It ain't what you don't know that gives you trouble, it's what you know that ain't so.”
- According to Wikiquote http://bit.ly/128Eb22: "Frequently attributed to Mark Twain, and often to Will Rogers. . . .[[as does Science News]]. . . ., Satchel Paige, Artemus Ward, as well as others."

REFERENCES [URL's shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 06 May 2013.]
Hake, R.R. 2013. “Effective Teachers Need Pedagogical Content Knowledge” online on the OPEN! Net-Gold archives at http://yhoo.it/13Zh89O. Post of 6 May 2013 13:13:17-0700. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists.

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Science Magazine - Special Section on Science Education

Some blog followers might be interested in a recent post “Science Magazine - Special Section on Science Education” [Hake (2013)]. The abstract reads:

*********************************************
ABSTRACT: Articles in Science’s “Special Section on Science Education” are listed at http://bit.ly/YoZeiq and are FREE after registration at http://bit.ly/104XZ2b. Bruce Alberts, in his lead editorial “Prioritizing Science Education” at http://bit.ly/120FUoS wrote (paraphrasing and adding URL’s): “Most college faculty have not yet faced up to the urgent need to improve on the standard one-size-fits-all lecture format - see 'Grand Challenge: Undergraduate Teaching: Transformation is Possible If a University Really Cares' [Mervis (2013)] at http://bit.ly/128og0N.”

Unfortunately, aside from Mervis’ (2013) panegyric to the education research of physics Nobelist Carl Wieman, Science makes no mention of Physics Education Research (PER), even despite the Science article “Teaching in a research context” [Wood & Gentile (2003)] at http://bit.ly/SyhOvL. They wrote: “Physics educators have led the way in developing and using objective tests to compare student learning gains in different types of courses, and chemists, biologists, and others are now developing similar instruments. These tests provide convincing evidence that students assimilate new knowledge more effectively in courses including active, inquiry-based, and collaborative learning, assisted by information technology, than in traditional courses.”
*********************************************

To access the complete 16 kB post please click on http://yhoo.it/YhNWtV.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: http://bit.ly/a6M5y0
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: http://bit.ly/9nGd3M
Academia: http://bit.ly/a8ixxm
Blog: http://bit.ly/9yGsXh
GooglePlus: http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE
Google Scholar http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3
Twitter: http://bit.ly/juvd52
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm

“There is substantial evidence that scientific teaching in the sciences, i.e., teaching that employs instructional strategies that encourage undergraduates to become actively engaged in their own learning, can produce levels of understanding, retention, and transfer of knowledge that are greater than those resulting from traditional lecture/lab classes. But widespread acceptance by university faculty of new pedagogies and curricular materials still lies in the future.”
- Robert DeHaan (2005)

REFERENCES [URL shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 02 May 2013.]
DeHaan, R.L. 2005. “The Impending Revolution in Undergraduate Science Education,” Journal of Science Education and Technology 14(2): 253-269; online as a 152 kB pdf at http://bit.ly/ncAuQa.

Hake, R.R. 2013. “Science Magazine - Special Section on Science Education,” online on the OPEN! Net-Gold archives at http://yhoo.it/YhNWtV. Post of 02 May 2013 10:24:00-0700. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists.


Saturday, April 27, 2013

Re: David Berliner on A Nation at Risk: Three Decades of Lies #2 - ADDENDUM #2

Some blog followers might be interested in a recent post “Re: David Berliner on A Nation at Risk: Three Decades of Lies #2 - ADDENDUM #2” [Hake (2013c)]. The abstract reads:

*********************************************
ABSTRACT: As a sequel to previous posts “David Berliner on A Nation at Risk: Three Decades of Lies #2” [Hake (2013a)] at http://yhoo.it/10dPm4V and “David Berliner on A Nation at Risk: Three Decades of Lies #2 – ADDENDUM” [Hake (2013b)] at http://yhoo.it/10g1iTV, I'm compelled to point out that today, 26 April 2013, the Fordham Institute http://bit.ly/15WNcPn and American Enterprise Institute http://bit.ly/ZpCkGc, both conservative think tanks, have placed on YouTube at http://bit.ly/10hDbUW a video “A Nation At Risk: 30 Years Later,” featuring such “reformers” as Lamar Alexander, William Bennett, Arne Duncan, Chester Finn, and Michelle Rhee. The only speaker not heaping effusive praise on A Nation at Risk is ex-conservative renegade Diane Ravitch. She says (paraphrasing): “What the writers of A Nation at Risk had in mind was higher standards, better schools, and a stellar public education system. But over the past 30 years the report has become the founding document of the privatization movement - the basis for privatization of the school system and the enrichment of a small number of entrepreneurs.”
*********************************************

To access the complete 16 kB post please click on http://yhoo.it/10jCnPq.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: http://bit.ly/a6M5y0
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: http://bit.ly/9nGd3M
Academia: http://bit.ly/a8ixxm
Blog: http://bit.ly/9yGsXh
GooglePlus: http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE
Google Scholar http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3
Twitter: http://bit.ly/juvd52
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm

“[The authors of A Nation at Risk] were wrong. Their predictions were all wrong. And I think it would be almost better to regard it as just a wake-up call. It's a way of using language that was overheated to . . . . get attention. But it had a real-world effect because for one thing it began the wrong march to destroy public education which is now in full flower.”
- Diane Ravitch in YouTube video "A Nation At Risk: 30 Years Later"

REFERENCES [URL shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 27 April 2013.]
Hake, R.R. 2013c. “Re: David Berliner on A Nation at Risk: Three Decades of Lies #2 – ADDENDUM #2,” online on the OPEN Net-Gold archives at http://yhoo.it/10jCnPq. Post of 26 April 2013 23:46:03-0700 to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists.



Thursday, April 25, 2013

Re: David Berliner on ‘A Nation at Risk’: Three Decades of Lies #2 – ADDENDUM

Some blog followers might be interested in a recent post “Re: David Berliner on ‘A Nation at Risk’: Three Decades of Lies #2 – ADDENDUM” [Hake (2013)]. The abstract reads:

*********************************************
ABSTRACT: In a previous post, “Re: David Berliner on 'A Nation at Risk': Three Decades of Lies #2” [Hake (2013)] at http://yhoo.it/10dPm4V, I quoted Ken Bernstein's comment on Diane Ravitch’s blog at http://bit.ly/13uNGbs (slightly edited): “Berliner was right in Manufactured Crisis (Berliner & Biddle, 1995/1996 at http://amzn.to/PGOfcT) about the ‘Nation at Risk’ report http://bit.ly/ZJ8Tyi of 30 years ago and is right today."

Berliner & Biddle wrote: “[The Nation at Risk report] made many claims about the ‘failures’ of American education, how those ‘failures’ were confirmed by ‘evidence’ and how this would damage the nation. (Unfortunately, none of the supposedly supportive ‘evidence’ actually appeared in ‘A Nation at Risk’ nor did this work provide citations to tell Americans where that ‘evidence’ might be found.) . . . . . . . . . When one actually examines the evidence, one discovers that it simply will not support the fiction that America has a generally failing system of education. This claim is nonsense.

SO IS AMERICAN EDUCATION OK?? In “Should the Culture of University Science Education Be Changed?” [Hake (2011)] at http://bit.ly/iegznz, I argued that it is *NOT*. For example, in Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5 at http://bit.ly/dtQhbS it's stated that (see that report for the references): (1) Sixty-nine percent of United States public school students in fifth through eighth grade are taught mathematics by a teacher without a degree or certificate in mathematics [NCES (2003)]; (2) Ninety-three percent of United States public school students in fifth through eighth grade are taught the physical sciences by a teacher without a degree or certificate in the physical sciences [NCES (2003)]; (3) The United States ranks 27th among developed nations in the proportion of college students receiving undergraduate degrees in science or engineering [OECD (2009a)]; (4) The United States ranks 20th in high school completion rate among industrialized nations and 16th in college completion rate [OECD (2009b)]; (5) The average American K-12 student spends four hours a day in front of a TV [McDonough (2009)]; (6) Sixty-eight percent of U.S. state prison inmates are high school drop-outs or otherwise did not qualify for a diploma [Harlow (2003)].

For one attempt to improve U.S. K-12 science education see "8+1 Science: A new concept in science education" [Michigan State (2012)] at http://bit.ly/Hz898n.
*********************************************

To access the complete 14 kB post please click on http://yhoo.it/10g1iTV.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: http://bit.ly/a6M5y0
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: http://bit.ly/9nGd3Mhttp://bit.ly/9nGd3M
Academia: http://bit.ly/a8ixxm
Blog: http://bit.ly/9yGsXh
GooglePlus: http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE
Google Scholar http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3
Twitter: http://bit.ly/juvd52
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm

REFERENCES [URL shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 25 April 2013.]
Hake, R.R. 2013. “Re: David Berliner on ‘A Nation at Risk’: Three Decades of Lies #2 – ADDENDUM,” online on the OPEN Net-Gold archives at http://yhoo.it/10g1iTV. Post of 25 Apr 2013 13:09:11-0700 to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists.