Would a Carbon Tax Alone Save Life on Planet Earth? Probably Not: Overpopulation Must Also Be Addressed

Some blog followers might be interested in a recent post “Would a Carbon Tax Alone Save Life on Planet Earth? Probably Not: Overpopulation Must Also Be Addressed” [Hake (2013)]. The abstract reads:

********************************************
ABSTRACT (CAPS in quotes are mine): As I pointed out in a post “Would a Carbon Tax Save Life on Planet Earth?” [Hake (2013a)] at http://yhoo.it/16ECfUn, Hansen & Romm (2013) at http://bit.ly/12djtSf wrote:

“We must have a simple, honest, across-the-board carbon fee COLLECTED FROM THE FOSSIL FUEL COMPANIES AT THE SMALL NUMBER OF DOMESTIC MINES AND PORTS OF ENTRY. All of that money should be distributed to the public -100 percent of it - with equal amounts going to all legal residents.”

Art Hobson (2013a) in an OpEd “Our planet passes a climate benchmark” at http://bit.ly/19tBwGD made a similar point but did not indicate, as did Hansen & Romm, that the carbon fee should be “collected from the fossil fuel companies at the small number of domestic mines and ports of entry.”

Al Bartlett (2013a) responded at http://bit.ly/10loNjf to Hobson's OpEd thusly:

“Here I want to comment on the FIRST OF TWO OMISSIONS in your otherwise excellent and comprehensive presentation. . . . . The ‘stop emissions’ is right on but unrealistic. As long as there are humans on earth, emissions of CO2 will continue at some level. It seems to me to be more realistic to say that: ‘We must embark on a long-term program of continually reducing the annual number of tons per year of greenhouse gases that are released world-wide into the Earth's atmosphere.’ . . . . [To do this] we have to STOP GLOBAL POPULATION GROWTH AND THEN REDUCE THE SIZE OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION TO SOME "SUSTAINABLE" LEVEL. And in a later post Bartlett (2013b) at http://bit.ly/11Og32G stated: “You did state that the solution is to put a tax on carbon. . . . . . The next question that needs to be addressed is: Given the real world in which we live, WHAT IS THE PROBABILITY THAT ON ANY USEFUL TIME SCALE WE CAN ACHIEVE THE GOAL . . . .. OF STOPPING CARBON EMISSIONS BY MEANS OF . . . . . . .PUTTING A TAX ON CARBON?”

Bartlett (2013c) discussed the SECOND OMISSION in a post “Exporting U.S. Fossil Fuels” at http://bit.ly/14sPuBM, stating: “Art and most of the environmentalists who strongly advocate the reduction of U.S. carbon emissions omit one important point. The U.S. exports a significant fraction of the coal that it mines. Thus U.S. coal is burned in other countries where it makes about the same contribution to global warming as it would have if it had been burned in the U.S.”

Hobson (2013a) may have “missed a point,” but Hansen & Romm (2013) did not!

As indicated above they, unlike Hobson, specified that “the carbon fee should be collected from the fossil fuel companies AT THE SMALL NUMBER OF DOMESTIC MINES and ports of entry.” Thus Hansen & Romm's carbon tax would discourage coal mining in the U.S. regardless of whether or not U.S. coal is shipped out of the U.S.

Hobson, in a response at http://bit.ly/124gGEU appeared to be unaware of Hansen & Romm (2013) and failed to make the above argument. But Hobson agreed with Bartlett that THE OVERPOPULATION PROBLEM NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE IMPOSITION OF A CARBON TAX. I also agree with Bartlett - see e.g. “L.A. Times Population Report: Beyond 7 Billion - Fighting the Last War?” [Hake (2012)] online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at http://bit.ly/TeOpJj.
********************************************

To access the complete 27 kB post please click on http://yhoo.it/1aRLIqF .

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: http://bit.ly/a6M5y0
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: http://bit.ly/9nGd3M
Academia: http://bit.ly/a8ixxm
Blog: http://bit.ly/9yGsXh
GooglePlus: http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE
Google Scholar: http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3
Twitter: http://bit.ly/juvd52
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm
LinkedIn: http://linkd.in/14uycpW

“If any fraction, large or small, of the observed global warming
Can be attributed to the actions of humans,
Then this is positive proof that the human population,
Living as we do,
Has exceeded the carrying capacity of the Earth.”
- Al Bartlett (2013a)


REFERENCES [URLs shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 27 June 2013.]
Hake, R.R. 2013. “Would a Carbon Tax Alone Save Life on Planet Earth? Probably Not: Overpopulation Must Also Be Addressed.” Online on the OPEN! Net-Gold archives at http://yhoo.it/1aRLIqF. Post of 27 Jun 2013 14:55:33-0700 to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the complete post are being distributed to various discussion lists.

How To Write Good

Some blog followers might be interested in a recent post “How To Write Good” [Hake (2013)]. The abstract reads:

*********************************************
ABSTRACT: Physoc’s Art Hobson, in a post “Once more time: Writing tips” alerted readers to (a) the abstract and the slides http://bit.ly/16T0UmN he had shown for a 2009 APS talk “Writing about, and teaching, physics for non-scientists”; and (b) two recommendations –
(1) The Craft of Scientific Writing [Alley (1996)] at http://amzn.to/YBnwWu, and
(2) The Elements of Style [Strunk & White (2000)] at http://amzn.to/109Cb9E.

To Hobson's recommendations I would add:
(3) the AIP Style Manual [AIP (1997)] at http://bit.ly/d8hJgp;

(4) “Intellectual Journey: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom - Conversations with John Kenneth Galbraith - The Art of Good Writing” [Kreisler (1986)] at http://bit.ly/ZMesNj;

(5) The Technique of Clear Writing [Gunning (1968)] at http://amzn.to/11QtG1t.

(6) “Draft No. 4: Replacing the words in boxes” [McPhee (2013)] at http://nyr.kr/12cz2Vu.

Q. So “HOW’m I DOin’ ” after having been exposed to the above 6 guides to writing good?

A. NOT BAD! The first 489 words of this post have a Gunning Fog Index of 8.8, cf. 11.9 for the first 530 words of Hemingway's masterpiece The Sun Also Rises !
; - )
*********************************************

To access the complete 14 kB post please click on http://yhoo.it/15ouwJm.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: http://bit.ly/a6M5y0
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: http://bit.ly/9nGd3M
Academia: http://bit.ly/a8ixxm
Blog: http://bit.ly/9yGsXh
GooglePlus: http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE
Google Scholar: http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3
Twitter: http://bit.ly/juvd52
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/XI7EK

“We are all apprentices of a craft where no one ever becomes a master.”
- Ernest Hemingway (1961)

REFERENCES [URL’s shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 08 May 2013.]
Hake, R.R. 2013. “How To Write Good,” online on the OPEN! Net-Gold archives at http://yhoo.it/15ouwJm. Post of 7 May 2013 20:00:15-0700. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists.

Hemingway, E. 1961. New York Journal-American, 11 July.

Re: Scientific illiteracy can kill the planet

Some blog followers may be interested in a recent discussion list post titled “Re: Scientific illiteracy can kill the planet” [Hake (2011b] reproduced below:

Art Hobson (2011) in his Physoc post “Scientific illiteracy can kill the planet” wrote [paraphrasing; my inserts at “. . . .[[insert]]. . . .”]:

“U.S. Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-Ky). . . . .[[ http://whitfield.house.gov/ and http://whitfield.house.gov/issues/energy.shtml]]. . . . is chairman of the House Subcommittee on Energy and Power . . . . .[[ http://energycommerce.house.gov/]]. . . . .. His scientific illiteracy - as reported in the NYT by Marshall & Lehmann (2011) - worries me. But the likely scientific illiteracy of the people who elected him worries me a lot more. . . .[[see the caricatures of a voter and Whitfield on page 13 of Hake (2011) near the panel “Scientifically illiterate voters elect scientifically illiterate leaders”]].... Physics teachers can and should help. We need to teach societal topics such as climate change and, more importantly, critical thinking in our introductory courses.”

And even more importantly work to upgrade the science/math education of prospective K-12 teachers.

In "Should the Culture of University Science Education Be Changed?"[Hake (2011a) I wrote [bracketed by lines "HHHHH. . . .":

HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
In a recent Science article “Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities” [Anderson et al. (2011)], thirteen biology research scientists, all Howard Hughes Medical Institute Fellows, deplore the prevalent university reward systems that “heavily weights efforts of many professors toward research at the expense of teaching.” They advocate seven initiatives that might help to address “widespread concern about educating enough scientists and scientifically literate citizens." Of primary concern in this essay is Initiative #1: "Educate faculty about research on learning. . . ." This is especially important if faculty are to play a prominent role in adequately educating prospective K-12 teachers, who might then, in turn, enhance the science/math literacy of the general population.

In that regard, I review an essay “The General Population's Ignorance of Science Related Societal Issues: A Challenge for the University” [Hake (2000)] based on an earlier libretto The Science Illiteracy Crisis: A Challenge for the University [Hake (1989)], with the leitmotiv: “The road to U.S. science literacy begins with effective university science courses for pre-college teachers.” The opera dramatizes the fact that the failure of universities throughout the universe to properly educate pre-college teachers is responsible for our failure to observe any signs of extraterrestrial intelligence.
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH


Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Honorary Member, Curmudgeon Lodge of Deventer, The Netherlands
President, PEdants for Definitive Academic References which
Recognize the Invention of the Internet (PEDARRII)
rrhake@earthlink.net
http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake
http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi
http://HakesEdStuff.blogspot.com
http://iub.academia.edu/RichardHake

“As the Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Energy and Power, Rep. Whitfield continues to advance an 'All of the Above' energy strategy that will employ Kentuckians and address domestic energy demands without unnecessary government regulation that results in higher energy prices, delayed resource exploration or stunted job growth. Rep. Whitfield is especially concerned that overreaching government regulations will have a negative effect on America's coal industry, which creates more than 134,000 jobs directly and supports 3.4 million jobs indirectly across the nation. In Kentucky, 17,900 jobs are created directly by coal.”
Whitfield's Energy Policy http://whitfield.house.gov/issues/energy.shtml

“Paleoclimate data help us assess climate sensitivity and potential human-made climate effects. . . . . . goals to limit human-made warming to 2 deg C are not sufficient - they are prescriptions for disaster. . . . . Rapid reduction of fossil fuel emissions is required for humanity to succeed in preserving a planet resembling the one on which civilization developed.”
Hansen & Sato (2011) - Hansen http://bit.ly/omiMY3 heads the
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies

“With the world population now at 6 billion . . .[On 21 July 2011 10:22-0700 world population was 6,950,419,151 - see http://1.usa.gov/j2u6Gw]. . . ., we are already consuming 40% of the world's photosynthetic energy production. Current estimates place a stable world population at about 8 to 10 billion by the late twenty-first century, assuming fertility rates continue to drop over the next several decades. Yet even at this reduced rate of population growth, we could eventually consume all of the planet's resources, unless we take action. Because of this overload of the world's resources, even today, over 1.2 billion of the world's population live below the subsistence level, and 500 million below the minimum caloric intake level necessary for life.”
- James Duderstadt (2000, page 20), President Emeritus and University Professor of Science and Engineering at the University of Michigan


REFERENCES [All URL's accessed on 20 July 2011; some shorted by https://bitly.com/]
Anderson, W.A., U. Banerjee, C.L. Drennan, S.C.R. Elgin, I.R. Epstein, J. Handelsman, G.F. Hatfull, R. Losick, D.K. O'Dowd, B.M. Olivera, S.A. Strobel, G.C. Walker, I.M. Warner. 2011. “Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities: Universities must better recognize, reward, and support the efforts of researchers who are also excellent and dedicated teachers,” Science, 14 January, 331(6014): 152-153: online as a 172 kB pdf at http://bit.ly/eSLoCl ; supporting online references suggested by R.R. Hake are at http://bit.ly/g24Iqm [over 75 references and 90 hot links relevant to (1) Undergraduate Education Reform, and (2) Biology Education Reform.

Duderstadt, J.J. 2000. A University for the 21st Century. Univ. of Michigan Press; for a description see http://bit.ly/cvJ1yI. Amazon.com information at http://amzn.to/lxT8YU.

Hake, R.R. 2000. “The General Population's Ignorance of Science Related Societal Issues: A Challenge for the University,” AAPT Announcer 30(2): 105; online as a 2.1 MB pdf at http://bit.ly/9LxKOL .

Hake, R.R. 2011a. Invited talk, “Should the Culture of University Science Education Be Changed,” Southern California Section of the AAPT, 14 May 2011, Pierce College, Woodland Hills, CA; online as a 3.2 MB pdf at http://bit.ly/iegznz and as reference #63 at http://bit.ly/b2UsK6. The abstract and link to the complete post are on my blog “Hake’sEdStuff” at http://bit.ly/lCyN97 with a provision for comments.

Hake, R.R. 2011b. “Re: Scientific illiteracy can kill the planet,” online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at http://bit.ly/opOSne. Post of 20 July 2011 to AERA-L, AP-Phys, Biopi-L, Chemed-L, CTP-L, Net-Gold, Physhare, Physoc, Phys-L, & PhysLrnR. The first few lines and link to the complete post were distributed to various discussion lists.

Hansen, J.E. & M. Sato. 2011. “Paleoclimate Implications for Human-Made Climate Change,” 20 July, online at http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.0968v2; to appear in Berger, Mesinger and Sijaci, eds., Climate Change at the Eve of the Second Decade of the Century: Inferences from Paleoclimate and Regional Aspects: Proceedings of Milutin Milankovitch 130th Anniversary Symposium (Springer, in press).

Hobson, A. 2011. “Scientific illiteracy can kill the planet,” Physoc post of 19 Jul 2011 10:40:25-0500; online at http://bit.ly/ofFjHn. To access the archives of PHYSOC one needs to subscribe : - ( , but that takes only a few minutes by clicking on http://bit.ly/dVm2AM and then clicking on “Join or leave the list (or change settings).” If you’re busy, then subscribe using the “NOMAIL” option under “Miscellaneous.” Then, as a subscriber, you may access the archives and/or post messages at any time, while receiving NO MAIL from the list!

Marshall, C. & E. Lehmann. 2011. “AEP Move to Stop Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project Shocks Utilities, Miners,” New York Times, 15 July; online at http://nyti.ms/on6ssu . . . . .[[AEP = American Electric Power, an Ohio-based utility]]. . . . The report quotes Whitfield: “ ‘I'm not really in favor of government subsidies for CCS or wind power or anything else,’ said Changing the Culture of Science Education (R-Ky.), chairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and Power. He supports private pursuit of CCS, because it can provide jobs in the coal sector -- but not because it addresses climate change, which he says human activity is barely affecting. ‘I think human activity is contributing to it, but I think the amount we're contributing is so small,’ he said yesterday. ‘For example, that big volcano eruption in the Philippines spewed more carbon dioxide in the world -- into the atmosphere -- than all the activity prior to that in human history. So yeah, I think human activity is contributing to it, but I don't think it's something to be so alarmist about.’ ”